![]() ![]() ![]() Was the source created at the same time of the event it describes? If not, who made the record, when, and why? However, by what you can answer, you may be able to determine whether you can accept the information as truthful. You may not be able to answer all the questions below. ![]() The other is that each source contains individual pieces of evidence to be considered as well. (The development of visual literacy poses its own challenges, which I may explore in future posts). For example, photographs have captured information about groups of people that the traditional archival record has not. I always advise my students to consider non-textual sources. While this post concerns written sources, one must remember that these questions can also be posed to other types of primary sources. When you are conducting research, you want to corroborate the contents of the document you are working with information from other sources that have been proven to be legitimate. Records created at the same time as an event, or as close as possible to it, usually have a greater chance of being accurate than records created years later, especially by someone without firsthand knowledge of the event. To produce sound historical research, we need reliable primary sources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |